
Administrator, End-user
AustLII
AustLII is the leader in the free access to law movement and has a philospophical bias towards open source systems. After investigating all the other possible major alternatives it seemed logical to turn to CiviCRM. We have software developer resources, and though it is not core business, we may be able to direct some of these resources towards improving CiviCRM for the community.


End-user, Administrator, Implementor
Center for Media Justice
Civi has been an amazing tool for CMJ (and for other organizations I work with) to keep our most important data all in one place in a user friendly way.


Supporter
Zing
Zing is a user of Civi software.
Zing wants to see more NFPs use Civi software.
Zing is helping fund further Civi software development and outreach.

Implementor
Ginkgo Street Labs
CiviCRM enables me to empower my clients with a database that suits their unique needs.


Administrator, End-user
Movimiento por la Paz -MPDL-
We needed a CRM, found CiviCRM and fell in love with it :). We're starting with 4.3, we hope we can be of some help for future updates.


Core Team Member, Developer, Implementor
CiviCRM, Caltha
I've always been passionate about what non-profits and advocacy groups can achieve using technology. For me, CiviCRM shows an essential example of how non-profit and technology worlds can come together to provide real change - working as community, creating value for yourself, but also for others in non-profit sector.


Implementor
Palante Technology Cooperative
Palante Tech works with social justice organizations on a tight budget to be more effective through technology. CiviCRM allows us to provide a high-quality low-cost database for community organizing, donor and membership management.


Consultant, Administrator, End User
Greenleaf Advancement
Greenleaf Advancement hosts, implements, supports, and provides training for CiviCRM. We take great pride in our role in helping nonprofits advance their mission. Combining our backgrounds in fundraising and technology, we are focused on helping organizations use CiviCRM to connect with their supporters and improve their fundraising results. Doing this as part of a vibrant open source community is in keeping with our belief that success overall only matters if we don't leave others behind.


Developer & Implementator
IXIAM
It's all about community. I love the CiviCRM philosophy and in IXIAM, we are trying to expand the spanish speaking community in Spain and Argentina


Developer and End-user
Fuzion
CiviCRM has one of the most active and friendliest communities I have come across. From initial tentative forum posts I was encouraged into engaging more actively through IRC and directly with other groups & individuals and am now happy to count many community members as friends. I recently found an article on the web that said if you post a question about CiviCRM anywhere on the web Lobo will post an answer within a few hours. It often feels like that is true.
One of the most valuable way in which the community supports me is by allowing me to bounce my ideas around and often someone is able to suggest an approach which is better than mine.

94110
Creative Arts Charter School, SFArtsED
Online donations, class registration, school tour registration, online enrollment applications, volunteer hour tracking, organization directories



Comments
entity vs. action
Hi,
I think we discussed it a long while ago and that one "more api" solution was to have the stat as an action on the entity rather than the other way around.
SO instead of
{crmAPI var="StatsS" entity="Stats" action="yearlycontributions" sequential="1" }
have {crmAPI var="StatsS" entity="contribution" action="getstats" name="yearly" sequential="1" }
clearer example: this one doesn't describe what it does
{crmAPI var="StatsS" entity="Stats" action="current" sequential="1" }
I don't recall what was the reasoning on keeping your initial syntax. Was this a technical issue?
I likely just forgot, will
I likely just forgot, will change it when I get time.
Would this be able to go down
Would this be able to go down to a contact level?
Sum of X person's contributions which have the campaign of Y?
That could be implemented… I
That could be implemented… I will work on it!