

Core Team Member, Developer, Implementor
CiviCRM, Caltha
I've always been passionate about what non-profits and advocacy groups can achieve using technology. For me, CiviCRM shows an essential example of how non-profit and technology worlds can come together to provide real change - working as community, creating value for yourself, but also for others in non-profit sector.


Developer
Electronic Frontier Foundation
I work for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. We switched to CiviCRM so that we could be sure that our membership data stays safe, secure, and private. Now we have control over our CRM and can customize it to work for our needs.


Implementor
Progressive Technology Project
The organizations we work with are experiencing the benefits of a robust tool that is
easy to use, supports their work, and allows them to collect and track data from various parts of their organization, such as membership, fundraising, communications, and organizing into a centralized database. CiviCRM as an open-source solution also allows us to nurture and build a user community to share and create a common vision of future features that would be useful to the community organizing field. Just two years after our pilot project, we're currently supporting 30 community organizing groups to use CiviCRM, and the community is steadily growing.


End-user
EFF
The CiviCRM community has been a tremendous resource for new ideas and helping us solve problems. We are excited to contribute customizations EFF makes back to core and support new features such as batch entry for offline donations or multiple payment processors on one donation form.


End-user, Administrator, Implementor
Center for Media Justice
Civi has been an amazing tool for CMJ (and for other organizations I work with) to keep our most important data all in one place in a user friendly way.


End-user, Administrator, Trainer
Progressive Technology Project
CiviCRM is helping us serve member-based community organizing groups across the
U.S. to keep better track of their events, fundraising, and membership data. It's helping our community to aim higher in terms of what kind of questions they should be asking and what kind of data they should be collecting. We chose CiviCRM because it's the best all-around tool to do what our groups need, AND because it's open source.


Developer, Implementor
Web Access India Pvt. Ltd.
I have been part of CiviCRM project from the beginning and feels great to see how it has grown over the years.
I am glad to be associated with such a wonderful open source project and an awesome community around it.


Implementor
BackOfficeThinking
CiviCRM allows us to bring all benefits and capabilities of a large commercial CRM and
donor management system to medium and large non-profits at a fraction of the cost. CiviCRM also allows smaller non-profits to benefit from an integrated solution for donor management, events, bulk email, etc. substantially increasing their effectiveness as compared to managing a variety of nonintegrated software and spreadsheets. Thanks to a strong CiviCRM community, CiviCRM’s functionality continues to advance and CiviCRM’s market continues to grow rapidly.


Implementor
ISHR
ISHR is currently in the early stages of implementing CiviCRM, and is finding the customisable aspects of the software to be especially beneficial.


Developer and End-user
Fuzion
CiviCRM has one of the most active and friendliest communities I have come across. From initial tentative forum posts I was encouraged into engaging more actively through IRC and directly with other groups & individuals and am now happy to count many community members as friends. I recently found an article on the web that said if you post a question about CiviCRM anywhere on the web Lobo will post an answer within a few hours. It often feels like that is true.
One of the most valuable way in which the community supports me is by allowing me to bounce my ideas around and often someone is able to suggest an approach which is better than mine.


Developer and Implementor
Tech to the People
Over the past 15 years I've been involved in several open source communities.
CiviCRM is without any doubt the one that has the strongest focus in welcoming "newbies" and letting everyone feel at home here. Another impressive feature is the focus on shipping. No matter what you think of CiviCRM today, you are almost sure that there will be a newer and better version in a few months.



Comments
Ohhhh no!
This is realy a sad news!
But I may life with the drupal version.
Is Powerbase an option?
http://ourpowerbase.net/2009/05/taking-the-wraps-off-the-powerbase-project/
Based on civiCRM it looks like a standalone solution, but they are a bit behind on their installer package.
powerbase is based on drupal + civicrm ...
they are pretty much based on the latest version of civicrm. we've been working pretty close with them on various canvassign features
lobo
No MORE Standalone is BAD
He this is really very bad News
Joomla is absolute no option due to its huge security risks.
http://secunia.com/advisories/search/?search=joomla&sort_by=date&sort_by=date
Most of there problems in the code don't get fixed and the sourcecode needs to be edited which takes you the chance to update to the next version
Drupal isn't much better and also has huge security problems
http://secunia.com/advisories/search/?search=drupal&sort_by=date
What about a combination with more secure CMS like ezPublish or TYPO3?
We hoped to get the stand alone version as it would have been much much easier to maintain, than Drupal or even Joomla.
We will have to look to a better and more secure solution!
Inaccurate generalization... security patches available
Actually, every item in the Secunia security advisory page for Joomla also has a patch provided to solve the issue. So your statement about code problems not getting fixed is generally incorrect.
This is one of the chief benefits of opensource, having a global user community for testing unlike proprietary code whose testing resources can be limited. Of course, as a Joomla integrator, one must select components from reputable developers who have sustainable business models to support proper maintenance and updates.
Having the standalone as an option would be good, as I frequently run into situations where the organization already has a considerable investment in their existing Web site and only need a CRM solution to run in parallel.
Of course, we can setup a minimal Joomla or Drupal site with CiviCRM installed, but it does seem like an extra layer of complexity.
Cheers!
Considering not many orgs are
Considering not many orgs are using CiviCRM as a standalone version, I don't think it's that bad to drop it, especially if the time spent on maintaining the standalone version is going into fewer bugs and and more features.
A strong vote for continued standalone support
A couple of months ago I implemented CiviCRM for a membership association (I'm their contract web developer). Since I'm a big proponent of WordPress -- and that was the framework I had in place for them before I chose CiviCRM -- I would love to see the standalone version continued. It was my first experience with CiviCRM, and my client is enjoying CiviCRM's simplicity compared to solutions such as Sugar CRM. I would hate to add the extra layer of complexity of adding Drupal/Joomla just to continue using CiviCRM.
Thanks for all your hard work.
We need maintainers ..
Jeff:
We need developers who are willing to step up and maintain and improve the project. Its upto the CiviCRM-Standalone community to keep the project alive and moving. Would be great if you are willing to be part of it / lead it
lobo
Not so much of a problem
Hi,
I first looked at the standalone version, but decided to install the drupal, that is basically a shell around civicrm and take care of the ACLs (more advanced than for the standalone).
If you only use civicrm and no drupal specific things, it adds about 30 minutes in your install time, and probably takes a few mb on the hard disk, but shouldn't be an issue these days.
X+
Standalone 3.2 Rogue?
I use the standalone version and recently adapted it to successfully use secure SSO through an ExpressionEngine CMS login challenge without using the OpenID wormhole. I suspect the same basic methodology could apply to other smaller, yet secure open-source CMS solutions, e.g. Mod-X, allowing for flexibility in development options for web designers/developers not married to "Drumla." I am not excited about going rogue alone, but I feel pretty strongly that aligning all success options for a CiviCRM sell with one or the other mega-CMS application may box out interest from smaller organizations and businesses (or even medium-sized ones) not ready/willing to change wholesale from already entrenched and capable open-source based CMS platforms. Perhaps I am just not aware that a Civi/Drumla installation can coexist productively and share secure (SSO) access controls with another full-featured, legacy open-source (LAMP) CMS, with that pre-existing application as SSO host. If this is the case, then please point me to where I can see such an installation in action.
Ugh. March madness of an entirely unexpected sort.
Drupal External Authentication
Hi Keith,
Drupal has core support for external authentication. You'll want to take a look at the following functions:
http://api.drupal.org/api/function/user_external_login_register
http://api.drupal.org/api/function/user_external_load
Note that they've improved a lot in D7.
For a guide on how to hook these take a look at:
http://www.centurionwebdev.com/content/authenticating-users-external-service-drupal-6
There's dozens of existing implementations of this:
http://drupal.org/project/cas
http://drupal.org/project/cosign
http://drupal.org/project/facebook_auth
http://drupal.org/project/googleauth
http://drupal.org/project/winliveid
http://drupal.org/project/shib_auth
http://drupal.org/project/certificatelogin
http://drupal.org/project/oauth
http://drupal.org/project/friendconnect
http://drupal.org/project/oscommerse_auth
http://drupal.org/project/ldap_integration
For others out there Drupal will give you more control over User Permissions than the standalone version. It also has OpenID in core if that's what you used previously. CiviCRM needs a shell of some sort to operate within. If you just need CiviCRM and nothing else than you are best off choosing the most supported shell for CiviCRM.
Did you put the code on the SSO somewhere or contribute back ?
Hi,
I'd be interested to see how you did it
X+
I will get it dressed up to come out and play...
It is not cleaned up for prime time as yet, but I am updating installation this afternoon from 3.0.3 to 3.1.3, so I will clean up and note diffs along the way.
I have been meaning to document it anyway, and in light of this development, I am not urgently needing to do so.
SSO is essentially a pass-through using a modified set of login and auth scripts that use login challenge from ExpressionEngine to validate user and boot standalone CiviCRM session array alongside a similarly protected ExpressionEngine session. The site in progress is mddccua.org. CiviCRm is the business back-end of their member relationship and event marketing and management operations, ExpressionEngine is the public facing community forum and association publishing platform.
Keith
I am NOW urgently needing to do so.
oops! Typo.
Please post this on downloads page!
I just found CiviCRM yesterday, and spent the whole day fighting (unsuccessfully) to get standalone version up and running, and then I discovered it was being dropped!!! What a waste of a day!
Please post this notice on the Downloads page so others can just bite the bullet and install drupal/joomla versions without wasting time on standalone version! Of course I would prefer not to have to install an additional application that I have to maintain, but I guess I have to look a CiviCRM as an excellent add-on module for Drupal!
P.S.- CiviCRM is far superior and much more polished than SugarCRM and vTiger so I look forward to digging in and seeing what it really can do!
Standalone support
I am willing to help with support but I do not have the time to do it alone or be the lead.
Would be great if you can try to form a group ..
of folks who are interested in maintaining and supporting standalone. At this point in time, we do not have anyone willing to lead it, so standalone tarball will not be part of the 3.2.alpha series
lobo
Shame....
Hi there,
Very sad to see the standalone version has been dropped... Shouldn't the Drupal and Joomla interfacing be done via the API or as a plug-in to the standard standalone version? That way there's just one codebase to maintain, and more people can use CiviCRM?
Just a thought...
In the mean time, I'll have to look for an alternative CRM...