
Implementor
ISHR
ISHR is currently in the early stages of implementing CiviCRM, and is finding the customisable aspects of the software to be especially beneficial.


Administrator


Core Team Member, Developer, Implementor
CiviCRM, Caltha
I've always been passionate about what non-profits and advocacy groups can achieve using technology. For me, CiviCRM shows an essential example of how non-profit and technology worlds can come together to provide real change - working as community, creating value for yourself, but also for others in non-profit sector.


Administrator, End-user
AustLII
AustLII is the leader in the free access to law movement and has a philospophical bias towards open source systems. After investigating all the other possible major alternatives it seemed logical to turn to CiviCRM. We have software developer resources, and though it is not core business, we may be able to direct some of these resources towards improving CiviCRM for the community.


CORE TEAM MEMBER
WEB ACCESS INDIA PVT. LTD.
Its great to work on a project that has a profound impact on non profits. I am very excited about the work we do on CiviCRM which involves building on each other's ideas to create best of breed solutions for non profits. The fact that CiviCRM is an open source project with an amazing community and dedicated developers is an icing on the cake.


Ally, FanBoy
Aspiration
By giving the nonprofit sector a values-driven, free/open source solution for CRM needs!


DEVELOPER
NS WEB SOLUTIONS
I'm quite impressed with the responsiveness of the CiviCRM community, both from the core developers and many experienced users who have quickly provided answers and ideas in areas where I just needed that extra insight, or where we needed to do something totally new. After several years working with open source software, I'm finding the CiviCRM community to be the most responsive and helpful I've seen.
We make CiviCRM one of our primary offerings because it just provides so much right out of the box that our clients need, without a line of custom code. And when we need to extend it for the clients' unique needs, the APIs and programming hooks let us add in features that would be impossible in some other systems. This means we can provide great value to our clients with quick turnaround times and reasonable budgets, which is great for our clients and for us.


Developer and End-user
Fuzion
CiviCRM has one of the most active and friendliest communities I have come across. From initial tentative forum posts I was encouraged into engaging more actively through IRC and directly with other groups & individuals and am now happy to count many community members as friends. I recently found an article on the web that said if you post a question about CiviCRM anywhere on the web Lobo will post an answer within a few hours. It often feels like that is true.
One of the most valuable way in which the community supports me is by allowing me to bounce my ideas around and often someone is able to suggest an approach which is better than mine.


Consultant
Circle Interactive
We help many not for profits implement CiviCRM through consultancy, training, configuration and custom development. Many of them come from a painful world of old Access databases, multiple spreadsheets and even paper. It's really satisfying to
help people move on with a system that's so much in tune with their own ethics of sharing and collaboration. We also 'eat our own dog food' and use Civi in-house for our client records because we love the flexibility and control it gives us.
For us it's important to share code and advice with other members of the community when we can because we know we get it back in help at other times. The community really is awesome and one of the friendliest and undaunting I've come across. We appreciate the huge value of the software to us and our clients so we try to contribute back and make it even better.


Core Team Member
CiviCRM
I find the engagement with our community of users to be intellectually stimulating
and rewarding. Seeing folks with expertise in a particular area step up and contribute their time and ideas to help improve the product is quite exciting. Every time I hear about a new interesting organization starting to use CiviCRM, I get a renewed sense of excitement about our work. The range of civic sector organizations currently using the software is quite amazing to me - from large international advocacy organizations to local performing arts troupes. I also really enjoy interacting with our international community - building friendships and getting to share culture (food, music, humor ....) with colleagues on every continent.


DEVELOPER
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION
At the Wikimedia Foundation, we leverage CiviCRM to maintain millions of records of donors and their contributions. Working with the product and particularly with the community has been a terrific experience. There's nothing quite like two open source organizations working together to meet their respective goals while ultimately strengthening the open source community as a whole.


End-user, Administrator, Implementor
Center for Media Justice
Civi has been an amazing tool for CMJ (and for other organizations I work with) to keep our most important data all in one place in a user friendly way.


Comments
great work - look forward to
great work - look forward to exploring both versions. para 7 has word 'deduce' - best to change to dedupe, since deduce also makes sense - sort of
API 3.0
What's the backward compitability with API version 2.0?
Also it was confusing some location API required your to put in the param version => '3.0',
I have a lot of customized code that uses API V2, if they are not backward compitable I would be in some hot water shortly. :\
breathe easy ...
v2.0 has been left as is, so existing code should work as is. Would be good if you can test before we hit final in case there are some unforeseen issues.
phewww.
xavier, lobo:
Thanks guys,
I realize that the day was probably going to come. I'm very happy that you guys decided to spearhead and tackle some of the API issues. I'm actually very excited to employ some API V3 and since it looks more standaridzed and eaiser to understand. I think for the long term view this is a great step since even if Civi Core refactors the entity action model can still be carried over.
I'll be more than happy to update my code to test the new API versions and offer any thing I find :)
Good work guys
My recommendation is to wait
My recommendation is to wait for the next Alpha release before doing any testing as we are working through the function rename now.
Personally as soon as the renamed apiv3 is back in trunk I'm going to try backporting it to existing sites & see how it plays (it should be fairly easy to backport after the rename)
Or better, fetch from svn
Hi,
The next alpha is coming out anyday (api branch has been merged back in the trunk).
I'd suggest to install from the svn from the trunk branch, likely that the code is updated at a steady pace during the alpha/beta period)
X+
version mandatory param ?
Hi,
You did test on the trunk, right ? version shouldn't be mandatory if I remember right. After a long soul searching, Eileen has started and changed API v3 so it's 100% compatible with v2 and if some people steps up, might be maintained longer than for the next version.
This being said, we would very very much appreciate if you can join us in the forum and try migrating a some of your code, see if it's as smooth as we hope.
Sounds fantastic!
Thanks for all the hard work of the core team and contributions from the awesome CiviCRM community!
Can't wait to give the next alpha a try.
release date for CiviCRM 4.0?
Hi, is there any projected release date for 4.0? I'm kind of stuck right now - I want to build a new install, but:
--Drupal 6 is on the way out
--CiviCRM has announced they won't be supporting or backporting anything to version 3.3 or before
--And yet, CiviCRM 3.4/4.0 isn't even close to ready
In effect, there's no good supported version. You've stomped over the old versions and told people to stop using them, but there's no new version. I tried Drupal 7 and CiviCRM 4.0 alpha, but there are install problems (no CiviCRM menu item created, other things a little wonky)... Basically I can install something old and deprecated, setting myself up for an immediate, difficult, mandatory upgrade path, or I can install something new and broken, setting myself up for a host of random problems. Neither of these choices is appealing.
By the way, the sandbox doesn't work:
http://d7.sandbox.civicrm.org/
demo/demo doesn't work for a username/password.
3.3 is still supported ...
1. I suspect 3.4 / 4.0 will be out in 4-6 weeks
2. 3.3 is still supported and critical bugs are being fixed. New features are introduced in 3.4 / 4.0
3. In general we do not backport new features to older versions.
Would help if you can be a lot more specific with what the bugs present in 3.4/4.0 on the forums here: http://forum.civicrm.org/index.php/board,61.0.html regards lobo
If you need something launched right away...
A) 3.4 will run on Drupal 6 so while there is no backports planned for 3.3.x the 3.3.x to 3.4 upgrade should be fairly painless.
B) While it is not recommended to use 4.0.alpha1 for a live site, nobody is stopping you from doing so.
If you go with B, I would recomend actively reporting your bugs in a reproducable maner.
Incorrect Contributor Listed
You state:
"In collaboration with JMA Consulting, CiviMember now allows membership upsell. This allows membership type to be changed on renewal while maintaining membership record continuity for the contact."
However, we, Corvair Society of America (CORSA), were the ones that provided the majority of funding for this project. Yet we are not listed anywhere on your site. In addition, after we were told the project had been fully funded, the campaign continued...
Updated the blog ...
Apologies for the oversight. We did not originally have information about the ultimate source of the sponsorship. I have updated the blog post and we will have more formal recognition post when the release goes stable which will definitely include the Corvair Society of America (CORSA).
Development costs for the project were actually not fully funded. JMA Consulting contributed the remaining hours.