Gepubliceerd
2007-09-14 17:21
A cron job executes periodically to process all the scheduled / running jobs for CiviMail. The admin can set an optional limit on the number of mails processed in the cron job. This allows two different invocations of the cron job to step on each other, a bad thing which could result in users getting multiple copies of the same mail. To avoid this from happening the cron script used flock. This had two main disadvantages:
- The cronjob could run on only one machine due to the file system lock
- The lock was very granular and applied to entire script (civimail.cronjob.php). This is not optimal
foreach job that is either scheduled or running do: lockName = "civimail.job.{$domainID}.{$jobID}"; acquire an exclusive DB lock for lockName if lock acquired: process job release lock end if end foreachOur php lock library code is reproduced below:
class CRM_Core_Lock { // lets have a 1 second timeout window const TIMEOUT = 1; protected $_hasLock = false; protected $_name; function __construct( $name, $timeout = null ) { $this->_name = $name; $this->_timeout = $timeout ? $timeout : self::TIMEOUT; $this->acquire( ); } function __destruct( ) { $this->release( ); } function acquire( ) { if ( ! $this->_hasLock ) { $query = "SELECT GET_LOCK( %1, %2 )"; $params = array( 1 => array( $this->_name , 'String' ), 2 => array( $this->_timeout, 'Integer' ) ); $res = CRM_Core_DAO::singleValueQuery( $query, $params ); if ( $res ) { $this->_hasLock = true; } } return $this->_hasLock; } function release( ) { if ( $this->_hasLock ) { $this->_hasLock = false; $query = "SELECT RELEASE_LOCK( %1 )"; $params = array( 1 => array( $this->_name, 'String' ) ); return CRM_Core_DAO::singleValueQuery( $query, $params ); } } function isFree( ) { $query = "SELECT IS_FREE_LOCK( %1 )"; $params = array( 1 => array( $this->_name, 'String' ) ); return CRM_Core_DAO::singleValueQuery( $query, $params ); } function isAcquired( ) { return $this->_hasLock; } }
Filed under
Comments
Thanks for the interesting post.
Have you run into any notable problems/limitations with the new scheme?
but v1.9 is still in beta and i suspect some of the larger installs have not yet migrated to it
lobo